Jump to content

Talk:Family Guy season 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Family Guy (season 5))
Featured listFamily Guy season 5 is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 17, 2009Featured list candidateNot promoted
January 16, 2010Featured list candidateNot promoted
May 4, 2010Featured list candidatePromoted
September 21, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
February 15, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
April 19, 2012Good topic removal candidateKept
July 24, 2012Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Featured list

my 2 cents

[edit]

this cannot be a GA, since a humongous table makes most of the text. Nergaal (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is irrelevant. Gage (talk) 02:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it isnot gage.--Pedro J. the rookie 16:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When the subject is covered in the table itself, there is no difference in whether it is covered in the article as simple text, or is put in a table to be better organized. Gage (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ask an expirienced wikupedian--Pedro J. the rookie 00:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am much more experienced than you. If you want to bring up articles that shouldn't have been brought up to GA, you can see Road to the Multiverse, Spies Reminiscent of Us, No Meals on Wheels, Boys Do Cry and Hannah Banana, none of which should even be listed as B status. Just because an article's long doesn't mean it should be nominated, which you seem to not understand. Gage (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not saying your not expirenced, plus those episodes are fine just that some peploe are just to damn damanding.--Pedro J. the rookie 01:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Gage. This is an episode list, so of course a lot of the info is in a table like it's supposed to. However, production and behind-the-scenes information is also present. I also agree with him about those GA articles. It's basically plot and reception. There's no production info, which is a major necessity for episode articles. Ωphois 13:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ophios no bad intentionbut can you repeat i did not understand.--Pedro J. the rookie 13:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
About which? Ωphois 13:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
everything you said sorry it got me confused can you repeate it but slower--Pedro J. the rookie 14:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
plus as i said i am planing to nominated for FLC agian, now i can take better care of the Flc because i had another flc that just closed.--Pedro J. the rookie 14:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, first of all, this article shouldn't be relisted until all the concerns are met.

Anyways, I was responding to Nergaal's comment about the table. This article is a list, so of course most of the info is in a table. I guess he has not seen a featured list before. I also agree with Gage's comment about the other FG articles being nominated prematurely for GA. They do not contain production information, which is the most important part of episode articles. There is no way that they will pass in their current condition. Ωphois 14:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thaanks for your comments always open to comments(as long as there not harsh) one quest do you think this should be on GAN.--Pedro J. the rookie 14:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The wording of the production section could use a tad bit of improvement, but otherwise, it should be GAN. Ωphois 16:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you asking me or Pedro? Ωphois 16:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody. I'm trying to determine how this is a prospective FL yet Supernatural is an article. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would depend on the level of information. Supernatural goes into detail about the writing process, filming, effects, etc. Family Guy is more general, like Highlander: The Series (season 1). Ωphois 17:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for esponding late wlaking my dog, aany way yes Family Guy is a bit more genaral but we based the editings on the simpsons FLs like season 1, why do hyou ask Dabomb--Pedro J. the rookie 17:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't sure if everyone was on the same page. Seems like we all agree this is a list, so everything should be fine. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
to dear Ophois: you guessed right as I h.a.v.e.n.'.t. seen any FLs before, so I definitely have no idea about my 2 cents I dropped by here. just because this article has roughly only 1400 words outside of tables of the 4700 words in the text, probably makes it a genuine article. Nergaal (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This looks exactly the same as Office Season 4. Ωphois 06:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, nearly all the lists you just cited are pretty much the same as FG season 5. Ωphois 06:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks--Pedro J. the rookie 19:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Family Guy (season 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Family Guy (season 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Family Guy (season 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Family Guy (season 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Family_Guy_season_5&oldid=1216299833"