Talk:Falun Gong/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Phillipedison1891 (talk · contribs) 03:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Cites a wide variety of sources. There is some redundancy and inconsistent formatting in the citations, though.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article is fairly comprehensive. Ideally, it could be a little leaner, but there is no obviously unnecessary detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Although the article goes into detail regarding the persecution of Falun Gong, this is no propaganda piece. Cites some skeptical sources regarding the more sensational claims.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Some minor controversy in the edit history, but it was almost a month ago, and was handled respectfully and sanely by all parties concerned.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Indeed a Good Article, although substantial improvement is required to bring it to FA status.
- Pass/Fail: