Jump to content

Talk:Fall for You (Secondhand Serenade song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fall for you as Emo?

[edit]

Any info on this. Most of the people listening to this music categorizes it as Emo. Please confirm Triadwarfare (talk) 08:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this song is considered in the emo genre. :| PlatypiPwn (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC) PlatypiPwn[reply]

RELIABLE SOURCES - that is what will stop this argument, find reliable sources. k-i-a-c (hitmeup - the past) 05:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This was never part of the emo genre but people, even tabloids and music blogs, will call it that cus of their "emo phase". Wikipedia's standards are way too low for sources. 118.210.44.201 (talk) 06:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bad quality pic

[edit]

someone please change the picture, the quality is no good. Dancey2 (talk) 00:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Good night, blatant vandelism. Someone else post the official video. Make sure it is the official video, do not and please don't post some video of you messing around. Thanks! Ein 02:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Legakis

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fall for You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]