Talk:Faith (George Michael song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Faith music video.jpg

Image:Faith music video.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Discussion

As the article has been tagged as suggested for a merge, I may as well go ahead and start the discussion with Strongly Oppose. While the basic song is the same, it was recorded in two completely different styles by two very divergent artists, with nearly a decade between them.TheBigFish (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Support. The convention seems to be putting cover versions on the same page as the original with the original first, no matter how different the versions are, how long a gap there is between them, or how notable the cover version is. Some examples:

All Along the Watchtower- Jimi Hendrix's cover is on the same page as Bob Dylan's original
Hurt- Johnny Cash's cover is on the same page as Nine Inch Nails' original
Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)- Marilyn Manson's cover is on the same page as the Eurythmics' original
Walk This Way- Run-DMC's cover is on the same page as Aerosmith's original
With a Little Help From My Friends- Joe Cocker's cover is on the same page as the Beatles' original
Tainted Love- Soft Cell's cover is on the same page as Gloria Jones' original

In each of these cases, not only is the cover version radically different from the original, but the cover version is a notable milestone for the artist doing the cover. I don't see why this article is any different. Thonan (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In light of this, I bow to convention, and will Support the merge.TheBigFish (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History - Second paragraph re analysis

I realize that, although the official policy of Wikipedia is everything referenced from reliable sources, a 'de facto' policy for many popular culture articles is to allow some unreferenced material unless challenged. Well, the second paragraph of the History section urks me: it could very well be true (that Michael meant for it to be a continuation and some other details) but there is no references and I don't think it reflects a neutral voice. Actually, I think it comes off as original research (some just wanting to publish their own analysis of the song). I am debating cutting it, but I thought I would just state it and give someone the opportunity to find a reference first - where I have failed. --Blondtraillite (talk) 01:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faith (George Michael song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hFf8iFDu?url=http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement to http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Limp Bizkit

Three paragraphs and an infobox about Limp Bizkit's non-notable version of this song is way WP:UNDUE. There used to be an "other covers" section, but was removed (appropriately) here by User:Muhandes. I'd suggest trimming the Limp Bizkit cover to a sentence or two, under the revised heading "other covers". This would encourage other editors to expand this section (with references). If the Limp Bizkit version was so popular, then User:TheVoiceGamePlay is welcome to write an article about it. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]