Talk:Fairchild XNQ

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Uninformative beginning

Shouldn't the article start with a mention of what the Fairchild XNQ is, rather than just jumping in with a "what if"? Geoffrey.landis 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point; this was one of my earlier efforts when I was trying to be more dramatic than encyclopedic. I'll change it. FWIW Bzuk 00:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Notes

The first flight date in the text and infobox are different, 'fastest trainer to date'? Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 00:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]