Talk:Fairchild Dornier 728 family

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Bulk up

This pages needs external links and photos.—Preceding unsigned comment added by A380 Fan (talk • contribs) 05:17 2006-05-06 (GMT)

Merge

Support: - THis page ought to cover the 528, 728, and 928. In addition, as "728JET" was later changed to just "728", the article should be renamed, possibly to Fairchild-Dornier 728 family. The Dornier 328 also needs alot of work, and should be renamed to [[Fairchild-Dornier 328 if it is going to include the 328JET, as it does now. - BillCJ 01:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs work now that I've done the merge. However, at least it's a start. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 04:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table

wouldn't it be better to put the characteristics into a table, so as to be able to compare the 3 - quatzalcoatl 18:04 09/06/2007 (UTC)

Done Reedy Boy 21:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Let's use this format for references. If not, what is your suggestion. {{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |url= |work= |publisher= |date= |accessdate=2008-01-03 }} found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_news Archtransit (talk) 01:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Design

We all know what the aircraft looked like. However, we shouldn't assume that the readers will know. Looking for basic information about the aircraft. Since there are no pictures, some description (such as low wing, 2 engines) may be useful. Either that or a link to a photo (not the photo itself unless we can find a legal one).

In other aircraft articles, there is some description of the basic design in this section. Archtransit (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the basic description of the aircraft should be in the first introduction. the point "design" is for a more detailed description. if the article is following the Wikipedia:AIR/PC the design point is too late for the basics in my opinion. Minkus (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/728jet/
Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]