Talk:Failure-oblivious computing

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Failure-oblivious computing was copied or moved into Fault-tolerant computer system with this edit on 06:19, 19 November 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

proposed deletion

I see the prod has been removed with the explanation that there are sources available. It would be nice if they were actually used to, you know, like verify the content of the article and provide evidence of notability. Just removing the prod in no way shape or form fixes the problems. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And deleting it certainly doesn't fix the problem! --Gwern (contribs) 23:52 2 October 2010 (GMT)

I have only one concern here: that Wikipedia not contain articles whose content is not properly verified or whose subject is not sufficiently notable for an entry. If you can fix these problems I have no problem with the article being kept, but in the long run the onus is on those arguing to keep an article to prove their claims that an article can be improved. Simply stating that it is possible accomplishes nothing. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]