Talk:Faegre & Benson

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ratings: Important ratings in established sources can be included,m if documented exactly to reliable sources. As none of them are, they have been removed. DGG 03:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ratings of the firm were from the law firm website and were created by the only law firm ranking systems available. Please do not make value judgments of how lawyers rank websites unless you are apart of our industry. If your are disregarding American Lawyer or Vault, you are clearly not an attorney and have no idea how we rank law firms. I am putting the ranking information back into the page, all of which cite back to the firm webpage. If you would like to delete it, start a discussion and go through the system.

Fair use rationale for Image:FaegreBenson.gif

Image:FaegreBenson.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Baker & Daniels

Since Faegre & Benson and Baker & Daniels have now merged to one firm, known as Faegre Baker & Daniels, the two articles should be merged into one under the same name.