Talk:Fading Suns

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theurge

I'm troubled by the presumption that 'Theurge' as described in the books falls into the same category as 'psionics' in this write up.

As the system differentiates between the two with separate mechanics, as well as theurgy occupying a different social standing, I think it would be better to structure the article such that occult phenonmenon have its own paragraph, with mention being made of theurges being divinely inspired sorcery in some fashion, and psionics being more stereotypical science fiction fare.

-Lextius

Aliens and Devilties has a passage that discusses this and states that theurgy and psionics actually being the same thing is a quite popular opinion, even though the church disapproves of it. PrinzMegahertz (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

I have updated a few details (ISBN numbers and name of the author of the Dead End shard). Perhaps this article should be re-done and expanded? It could easilly be upgraded from Low Importance. -Vithar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vithar Alderland (talk • contribs) 09:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the Interstellar Dispatches to the RedBrick publications. Vithar Alderland (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added a section on the FSR edition released at GenCon2012. Vithar Alderland (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://fadingsuns.wikicities.com/wiki/Main_Page
Triggered by \bwikicities\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Shadis #29 (1996)
Pyramid #24 (March/April, 1997)
Dragon #251