Talk:Fader Bergström/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox looks good!
- Thanks.
Remove the best-known and best-loved songs part, as that is not sourced
- Done.
Add a sentence ending the lead about the reception/legacy of the composition
- Done.

Retitle to Reception and legacy
- Done.
"before the Chancellor of Justice. Fortunately" → "before the Chancellor of Justice and fortunately,"

^* Done.

Are you sure unbridled is an appropriate term here?
- Said 'unrestrained' instead. Means the same thing.
Pipe street-girls to Prostitution
- Done.
Add the release year of Glimmande nymf
- Added.
Imgs look good!!
- Thanks.

Copyvio score looks quite good at 31.5%!
- Noted.
Should ref 13 be cited in place of ref 8 since it includes p. 149?
- Merged refs.
Remove or replace ref 16 per WP:RSPYT
- Removed.

On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done all those, thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap Nice work on this, but you still need to fix the Chanceller prose in reception since those sentences are too short to be on their own. --K. Peake 20:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, thanks for fixing everything so quickly! --K. Peake 07:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]