Talk:Face My Enemy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images: As it stands, I think the fair use statement for the infobox image is a bit iffy. But I think it can be fixed based on the article content already. If you change the caption to mention the CGI work the team did to superimpose Wen's face on her stunt double then based on this already being in the article and "needing to be seen to understand the description", then I think it'd be fine. Given the caption on the image of the concept art and that already in the article body, I think that is already fine as it is.
Lead: I would suggest that a brief sentences is added to capture the Design section.
Development: Just thinking about how to flesh out this particular subsection a little. Have the writers/directors previously worked on the series, and could this be mentioned?
Filming: Is it worthwhile mentioning that when working on "The Dirty Half Dozen" that the director wanted to outdo the May vs. May fight scene here?
Ratings: Is there anything to be said about comparing the ratings to the previous episode or following episode in the series?
Critical response: Link HitFix, and to the season 1 article where you say "previous season"

I'm not sure how useful it is for readers to see episode-to-episode ratings comparisons (although they can see that over at the season article anyway). Instead, I've added a comparison to the season average, which should give readers a bit of an idea of where it falls compared to the season as a whole. Other than that, I think I've done everything else you noted. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - more than anything, it's simply to provide a degree of context to the ratings so the reader can determinate if they were good, bad or indifferent. Anyway, happy to promote now. Miyagawa (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]