Talk:Fabrik Inc.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Written Like an Advertisement

I would like to suggest making the following changes in order to correct the tone

Remove: "Fabrik’s bundled hardware and software products can be found at major retailers, office supply stores and a variety of online retailers."

Remove: "in various capacities and styles"

The Company History section should be before Products & Services.

Reword the sentence that starts: "The company also has a pure online backup approach"

Throwing out the suggested changes for any comments before taking off the flag. Scooter put a flag on my talk page, and I thought for sure someone else wrote the content, but there I am all over the history section! —Preceding unsigned comment added by David44357 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that assessment and (re-)inserted an advert tag. Besides the stuff you mentioned, the article has an enormous number of extlinks to company press releases and the like. 67.122.209.126 (talk) 08:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some quick cleanup. A good next step would be removing information sourced only by press releases. --Ronz (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, looks better now. Given it was eaten by HGST which was eaten by WD perhaps should be past tense. W Nowicki (talk) 21:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]