Talk:Fabian Cancellara/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MadGeographer (talk · contribs) 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
This is a very good (and detailed) article.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars:
- No edit wars:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- Appropriate use with suitable captions:
- Appropriate use with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I think you've done a great job here! Note: this is my first GA review, so in case I missed something, additional comments are welcome (although I really don't see anything now that could prevent this article from being listed at GA). mgeo talk 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
yeah your first ork. and if there are any questions, just write to presse(at)infrontringier.ch . this article is ridiculous. cancelara is obvious part of...ahwww ya know what. i go to sleep. at last - he´ll be armstronged. if not, he´ll pantani himself :D. bye 217.191.51.229 (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)