Talk:FO(.)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Pcarbonn (talk · contribs)

About notability

"FO(.)" is hard to find using search engine, but, as a sign of notability, this paper using FO(.) received the 2016 Rule Challenge award. Pcarbonn (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this paper received the Best Paper award at Declarative AI 2020, and uses FO(.). Pcarbonn (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The paper on FOLASP also describes FO(.) and its semantics in great detail. --VadeveSi (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The field of research where FO(.) belongs to, viz. knowledge representation languages, is definitely notable, but up to now poorly represented in Wikipedia. See knowledge representation and reasoning and frame language, while knowledge representation language completely ignores formal languages. So I consider this article a valuable part of an effort to fix the poor situation. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]