Jump to content

Talk:FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 2000s

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Warren Steed Jeffs is not #481 but #482. 481 is Michael Paul Astorga.

464 is Francis William Murphy 465 is Dwight Bowen, captured in Richmond, Virginia 82.157.241.241 19:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

[edit]

I just moved FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives by decade, 1990's to FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 1990s. I would like to make the analogous change for this article, if no one objects. Wmahan. 20:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph "Bucky" Phillips

[edit]

I'd add him myself to the list, but I don't know the proper convention in this here parts. His article says he was added September 7th, 2006. Here's his FBI page --Lemi4 09:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Roy Mack

[edit]

Some contributions here perpetuate the falsehood that Darren Mack was among the FBI Top Ten. But Mack NEVER attained that status. The FBI merely identified him as a "most wanted fugitive", which they sometimes do, as they profile certain fugitives on their main wanted web page. Apparently this is what Nancy Grace must have seen on July 21, 2006, and so then she falsely implied repeatedly that Mack was a Top Ten Fugitive [1]. But you will see that Mack does not have a corresponding FBI Top Ten sequence number, precisely because he never made it on to that very select FBI list. Please note also that the FBI issued a National Press Release on the actual true next Top Tenner in the correct sequence on September 7, 2006, noting that "Ralph B. Phillips is the 483rd person to be placed on the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives" list" [2]. #482 was clearly Warren Steed Jeffs on May 6, 2006. And "Michael Paul Astorga was the 481st person to be placed on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted Fugitives” list" [3]. So clearly Mack never made the FBI Top Ten list, despite the Nancy Grace comments. So the Wikipedia pages all now need to be corrected accordingly, as they are in gross error.Steven Russell 01:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kobi Alexander

[edit]

Now, I follow the FBI Top Ten List religiously, and never once have I seen this Kobi Alexander on the list. Should it be removed? --PAK Man + 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified Subjects

[edit]

FBI fugitives #473 and #479 have never been identified by the FBI. However, given the timeline that these appointments to the list occurred, it is almost certain that the two fugitives are Luke Helder (#473) and Jesse James Hollywood (#479). Should this article contain reference to these two men as the likely holders of the respective spots? I posted this information and someone has since deleted it. RyanGentry 20:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The basis for deletion was that since the two are still living, it violated WP:BLP. --PAK Man Talk 15:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree it would be inaccurate to list them as the suspects, I don't feel it violates WP:BLP to list them as the "likely" holders of these spots. The intent of WP:BLP is to prevent false claims; the claim that these two men are "likely" the suspects is not false, it is true. If not appropriate on this page, would you feel it appropriate on a seperate (new) page? RyanGentry 08:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)gegsdfgry[reply]

Vandalism ???

[edit]

Under "3 FBI Most Wanted Fugitives in the 2000s":
"1 Most Wanted In USA : Hypa & Legacy... fukk Osama" - what ? f(O_o) --My.life.is.muzik... (talk) 04:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC) fdrgjgfhbcgf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.119.18.114 (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missing ?

[edit]

Typing Maghfoor Mansoor into the search box will redirect the user to the list, although his name does not appear anywhere on that page anywhere I can see. He was placed onto the Most Wanted list in the 2000s, the article does not reflect this yet still his name redirects to the article. Has it been deleted? Sparkstarthunderhawk (talk) 23:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maghfoor Mansoor was #463. His section of the article was deleted by vandals in October. Is there any way to restore the article to the pre-vandalism content, without deleting subsequent legitimate updates? RyanGentry (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, maybe someone should try? If you saved the entire page somewhere, restored the article, then retyped everything else back in, it might work. Sparkstarthunderhawk (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism to the entry for Maghfoor Mansoor has since been undone, with this edit. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The logo that's the main picture for the page, does not appear on the FBI website as the caption states... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgb1110 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mogilevich s1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Mogilevich s1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robertfisher.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Robertfisher.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexis Flores.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Alexis Flores.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduardo Ravelo.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Eduardo Ravelo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saenz jl2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Saenz jl2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 2000s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 2000s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 2000s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:FBI_Ten_Most_Wanted_Fugitives,_2000s&oldid=1206263175"