This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil Rights MovementWikipedia:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementTemplate:WikiProject Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
The Man in Question What sources refer to this letter as "You Are Done"? I can't find anything. I realize this is a phrase taken from the letter. On a side note, where in the letter is it redacted? There are redacted letters, but this one is free of redactions. Mitchumch (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The New York Times article (Gage) already cited refers to the letter by this name. I have added a second reference. If you wish to remove it, I won't protest, but it was under that name that I had searched for it on Wikipedia before finding this page. — the Man in Question(in question)21:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A name is redacted at the end of the third-to-last paragraph. The same name is given more clearly in other images of the letter, but never clearly enough to be read. This has been done, as the Times article says, "because The Times could not verify or disprove the claims about her." — the Man in Question(in question)21:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gage claims that it was received by Coretta on accident, and it was unplanned that King would be away and not see it until later. I recall having read the opposite at one point. Other sources on this are needed. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It shouldn't be called "FBI King suicide letter" when it is not proven that suicide was the intention
Beverly Gage of the New York Times noted upon its full release in 2014 that there were different possibilities with regards to what its intentions were.[1]Speakfor23 (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]