Talk:Women's Super League

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: WOSO Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: England / Women's football High‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as High-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Proposed Mergers

I'm closing this as not merged due to 1 negative response and a lack of subsequent discussion. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with FA WSL 1

Articles all have similar contents. 333 -blue 01:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - two separate divisions w/ different teams, records, history, etc. Hmlarson (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Would you merge Football Championship, League 1, League 2 page together? No. Therefore I oppose to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V199629 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with FA WSL 2

Articles all have similar contents. 333 -blue 01:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - two separate divisions w/ different teams, records, history, etc. Hmlarson (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FA WSL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved.(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 13:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA WSL → FA Women's Super League – As per WP:NCA, We don't normally title articles using acronyms unless that name is overwhelmingly used for the subject. In this case, while the name is often referred to as the WSL, the full name is also commonly used, including in the competition's own logo, as can be seen in its infobox. It is also common in media usage, e.g. by the BBC here. By way of comparison, we have articles at FA Women's Premier League not FA WPL, English Football League not EFL, Scottish Professional Football League not SPFL etc. "FA" can stay abbreviated, as it's an additional descriptor rather than a main part of the competition's name, and "Football Association" in full isn't regular usage here. Jellyman (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Hmlarson (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Plausible when we look at other leagues. -Koppapa (talk) 06:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the nominator. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Chelsea champions?

I wonder if Chelsea should be listed under Champions, and equally Everton in the WSL 2 section. The spring series is no full season, and the way i remember always called one off tournament. No relegation was used/no places for the Champions League awarded and I don't think Chelsea are English champion by winnign the Spring series. -Koppapa (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are called "champions" on official competition website in the match report, and also received a trophy, so it should be listed somewhere in the article, maybe a note should be included next to "2017" in the table with an explanation about spring series. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, they are champions of the spring series, sure. fawsl.com wording is "champions of inaugural spring series". A headnote would be good, because its not a wsl 1 championship (=english championship like the other in the table). A seperate section could work too. -Koppapa (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the 2017 title should be included, as the WSL note it on their list of top flight championships:

https://twitter.com/BarclaysWSL/status/1662851977322045441?t=cd8hD0SiZj6HVkYHrpUbvg&s=19.

The WSL also include it on their website top flight seasonal tables:

https://womenscompetitions.thefa.com/en/League-Tables/League-tables. 2.30.148.160 (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I can find you at least two tweets from that same WSL Twitter source, where they didn't count the 2017 series among the titles, the sources are inconsistent. Just refer to the worldfootball and RSSSF, which are very reliable sources, and none of them counts it. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FA Women's Super League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324085639/http://www.shekicks.net/news/view/38 to http://www.shekicks.net/news/view/38
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rovers.co.uk/page/LadiesNews/0%2C%2C10303~1938465%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Women's Super League (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 07:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FA Women's Super League → Women's Super League – Under the new rebrand, "The FA" has been dropped from the league name as part of the long term strategy for the league to be under new ownership in the future. Per release Hjk1106 (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I think that will be the new WP:COMMONNAME by the looks of it. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per official source, and this can be moved right away since its not controversial. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to but I got an error message: "The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid." Hjk1106 (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests if the move is obviously uncontroversial, like the change of the name of the competition, and it will get moved by admin. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Seany91 (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 13:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Giant Snowman 13:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Totally agree with this. Have requested to have it moved as per Snowflake91's info. Sirhissofloxley (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.