Talk:F-41 (Michigan county highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 02:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Can some descriptive information be added to the lead? The sentences "Realignments of US 23 spawned both versions of M-171." and "Prior to taking this designation, the route as known as Old M-171 in Iosco County and presently has no other name besides F-41." sound awkward. The last sentence of the history describing the road names should be incorporated into the route description.
Should be addressed with some copy edits. Imzadi 1979 → 03:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough 48 72 02:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 03:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]