Jump to content

Talk:F+W C-3605

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

many mistakes

[edit]

It was the "Eidgenössiches Flugzeugwerk (F+W)" the producer, not the Konstruktionswerkstätte (K+W), as the first one was taking over 1943 the aktivities. Both are the production units of the Swiss Army, now part of RUAG. Farner Werke was an other company and may be supplier. They still exist as a supplier. See also my work in the German Wikipedia, but there I want first to finish before I start to translate. But anybody else? --Blauer Heinrich (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on F+W C-3605. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Armament?

[edit]

Since when is a target towing winch a weapon? This section needs a better heading, I propose "Equipment". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]