Talk:Eyes Wide Open (exhibit)

Anti-war Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

Article lacks a npov. Also has some tonal issues and needs better sources. As it is now, all sources belong to the organizations related to it, making the whole thing seem like advertising. --Lendorien 01:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean now? (ApJ (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Links

I added more outside links that address controversy. I have also edited the language so that it sounds more factual. For example, I changed "commemorating" to "observing" and took out that it is a memorial. I don't think that controversy should be discussed within the article itself, the article should of course just contain factual information about the exhibit. (66.134.230.178 19:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I have added outside links. The organization that the exhibit is related has the most factual and up-to-date information on the exhibit which is why many of the links are from their website. What needs to be changed in terms of tone? (Afscewo 20:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Revert

On 06:23, 11 August 2007, Naier overwrote this article with one about a music single. I have reverted it and moved the music article to Eyes Wide Open (song). --Lendorien 22:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EWO D.C..jpg

Image:EWO D.C..jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Eyes Wide Open (exhibit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]