Talk:Extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was speedy userfy.

Opening heading

Checked it out. I'm not in the groove at the moment, so I'm just going to give a couple of short comments. Too much reliance on USPAP standards for referencing. Provide links in the refs, or at least short quotes so we know what's said there. Reduce the redlinking.

Please sign your comment so I know who you are in case I have a discussion going with you. The concepts are important to appraisal because of how they are treated differently under USPAP, so most of the references are going to come from either USPAP or sources talking about the interpretations of USPAP. Also, the only references I have completed are the direct USPAP references. The other references listed are only in shorthand which I expect to make more complete later. I need to add a couple of dozen other references from AI's Appraisal of Real Estate, ASA's Appraisal of Machinery & equipment, Blacks Law dictionary, Yellow Book, some references from Websites, and references from some other textbooks. I would also like to reference IVS, but it is not published online and the only copy I have is old, and I am not that familiar with IVS. Thaks KTrimble (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remaining edits

I took out all of the redlinks, but will need to put them back in if I every write the connecting pages.

I was also wanting to put in a photo of a gear-up landing damaged airplane to talk about assumptions in the valuation of repaired property with damage history in the examples. When I get access to Farm Managers, IAAO, etc. sources, I would like to add more references.

KTrimble (talk) 04:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan Status

I was planning on authoring several articles on the subject of real estate appraisal and USPAP, many of which would refer to this article. But I have decided to forgo any intentions of ever contributing anything else to Wikipedia. You can check my talk page to find out why.

If somebody wants to make some edits, they could probably go into some other pages on related subjects (if they exist) and refer this page in those pages. You will probably have to create pages on I'm not going to waste the time.

If you do, be aware that there is a capitalization issue. There is a bot out there that will come along and capitalize all the words in the title, and then a few weeks or months later, another bot will come through an remove the capitalization on all but the first word. When that happens, links in other articles to this article will get fucked up. KTrimble (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The account that changed the capitalization of this article, User:Ihcoyc, User:Unbroken Chain, and User:Vegaswikian are people, not bots. Normally there's a redirect left behind so incoming links don't get broken; otherwise page movers should be fixing links that they break. -- Beland (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent 2012 USPAP Changes

The most recent version of USPAP has made some changes to the interpretations of EAs and HCs that need to be addressed in this article. I created this article, but I found my experience with Wikipedia to be so frustrating that I really don't think that I am going to fuck with it anymore. There needs to be a page on appraisal conditions, appraisal problem, etc. ect. that refers to this article, but if I created any, they would immediately nominated for deletion by some Wikipedia Jock trying to make stats to be promoted, and I simply don't have the time or the energy to devote to an argument over a project that I don't care that much about. But the article still needs to be updated. If somebody else doesn't update it soon, I might see if I can nominate it for deletion or just blank it out. KTrimble (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]