Talk:Extra Texture (Read All About It)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Why was the tour controversial? Maybe it was just poorly received?
Done yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"last-ever" - overmphasized, just "last"
Done yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"It is considered to be Harrison's soul album, " - Confusing. Reword it.
Done But I think, I may have made it more confusing(?) yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. How about "Featuring elements of soul music and demonstrating... , the album was something..."--GoP_T^C_N 09:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Added. yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 09:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"hit single in the song "You"," - in the song? Maybe "it produced the moderate hit single, "You"". Also how can it be both moderate and a hit single?
Would "it produced the moderately hit single" work? yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better--GoP _T ^C _N 09:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 09:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Forum links to a city?
Done "Forum shows, in Los Angeles". yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"(from Horn)" - Horn is a band?
Done Jim Horn. Session musician. yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has too many overemphasized language, eg "last-ever", can be just last
Done Fixed. yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 19:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Just a few small issues.--GoP _T ^C _N 18:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail:

Pass Great article! :)--GoP _T ^C _N 09:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]