Jump to content

Talk:External validity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

has anyone noticed the same definition has been given for both internal and external validity.


This article is rife with issues, but that's aside from my current point. Removed a link to transferability simply because the link was wrong, it went to an article on chemistry instead of Qualitative Statistics. 99.127.42.25 (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should have specific studies and research as examples instead of just saying "For example". Orca3214 (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me, or does it look like this article only discusses external validity applied in social psychology? To me, it looks like the article about external validity ironically does not have external validity itself... What about research areas that do not conduct experiments with people, like physics or computer science? Jfresen (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]