Talk:External counterpulsation

Marketing?

All of the external links on this page seem to point to one or two companies that manufacture EECP devices. This makes the article look like marketing. Should these be removed or moderated?Cantorum (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use by Robin Quivers

Robin Quivers is not a scientist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.249.3.133 (talk • contribs)

External Counter Pulsation Link

EECP

External Counter Pulsation

External Counterpulsation

ECP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.42.62.107 (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All links above are spams! -- Bernard Bel (talk) 06:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Massive copyvio

The bulk of this article (as it appeared today) consisted of material added in a massive copy-paste from [1], in a series of three edits by an anonymous IP editor in September 2012: [2]. The edits to the article since then have principally been cosmetic in nature, so I've rolled back the article to the way it appeared immediately before the copyvio was added. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Useful Research Article for EECP Page

Enhanced External Counterpulsation Therapy: Past, Present, and Future Authors: Anoshia Raza, MD, Kate Steinberg, MD, Joseph Tartaglia, MD, William Frishman, MD, Tanush Gupta, MD

KHunt101 (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Article Quality

The quality of this article is very poor given the amount of information available today about EECP treatment, as well as new research being conducted.

The "Medical Uses" section does not even scratch the surface in terms of what this therapy has been and will be used for. It only cites 2 review articles that are more than 5 years old which claim that EECP is ineffective. Evnfrnk (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What high quality reviews do you feel are missing? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]