Talk:Expedition to the Barrier Peaks/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review this article. Cirt (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 25, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable wording. Passes here.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects of topic - I like the Reception section.

4. Neutral point of view?: Written in neutral tone.

5. Article stability? Article is stable going back a ways, and no apparent conflict on talk page.

6. Images?: One image from Wikimedia Commons, the other is fair-use cover and has approp rationale on image page.

Nice job overall. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 08:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! :) BOZ (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]