Talk:Expedition Everest/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 03:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC) I will be reviewing this one. The review will commence in a few days. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]The mention of the cost of the ride needs to be featured within the article's body.
- It's already in the Awards and records section.--Astros4477 (talk) 17:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
The claim of the ride being the 18th mountain-based attraction also needs to be featured in the body
- It's already in the Mountain section.--Astros4477 (talk) 17:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Isn't the ride themed about a lost train hurtling through the Himalayas, with the rogue train finally encountering the Yeti at the ride's denouement?
- This is also mentioned later.--Astros4477 (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Other than this, the lead seems good.
Infobox
[edit]References for all the statistics that do not have references within the article itself. Other than that, we are good.
- Everything is either referenced in the article or it is on the RCDB link at the bottom of the infobox.--Astros4477 (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
History
[edit]I will get to this in a bit. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
This section is a laconian one, but I believe it passes.
- "Laconian"? OED: "Of or pertaining to Laconia or its inhabitants; Lacedæmonian, Spartan." Wondering what you meant. --Stfg (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Queue
[edit]I have been in this queue, so maybe a bit more can be discussed about the museum in the queue, and how the show Destination Truth donated Yeti paraphernalia to the ride's queue. Just a suggestion, otherwise it passes.
Layout
[edit]You may want to expound to the reader that a helix is an inversion or, even simpler, a loop.
- A helix is not an inversion or loop.--Astros4477 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Trains
[edit]Needs a few more stats about the trains themselves.
Track
[edit]Good.
Facts
[edit]Have other parks achieved this distinction? If so, you may want to tell the readers this.
- Reached what distinction? If you're talking about going backwards, I don't really think we should add the other coasters that go backwards.--Astros4477 (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Mountain
[edit]I see mention that this ride is Disney's 18th mountain attraction. Can you tell the readers how many mountain-based attractions there are in the Florida parks?
- I added how many there are at all the Disney parks as the 18 refers to all the Disney Parks.--Astros4477 (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Yeti technical details
[edit]Due to the lucid details given, I think this section is the best so far.
Promotions
[edit]Stopping here to allow you time. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Discovery Channel
[edit]I fixed a misspelling for Les Stroud (not Les Strout).
I need references for the Nepalese expedition.
I need a reference for the innovative scaffolding used.
Other than that, this section passes.
Everest in the City
[edit]This section passes.
Incidents
[edit]The sole incident is covered well.
Awards and records
[edit]I need refs for the Golden Ticket and Best Coaster Poll results.
- They are there in the tables.--Astros4477 (talk) 19:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Everything else is good!
Conclusion
[edit]This review went very smoothly, and as soon as the outstanding issues are addressed, I can pass this article! Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have addressed all your comments.--Astros4477 (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)