Jump to content

Talk:Expand Networks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2012

[edit]

I'm adding a request for Semi Protection of this page. Semperfi4000 (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

I'm adding a request for temporary protection of this page. Semperfi4000 (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting removal of temporary protection of this page and removal of the uncited and incorrect financial information from the history despite foreign language attributions. They are being cited as fact and are not. Entries should be encyclopedic and the author clearly has COI issues. 98.109.51.42 (talk) 13:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been a clear case of positive vs negative marketing. It does not merit temporary protection of the negative no matter how attributed -- it lacks balance. Aspects of the article are also lacking attribution and should be removed. Encylopedic content is lacking and COI are evident. --Fair&Balanced45 (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I'm requesting an exemption to the temporary protection of this page to remove the negative marketing that is unattributed. I am creating a neutral encyclopedic history of Expand Networks with proper attribution and will update when permitted. I ask that if you wish to make changes that you propse them on this talk page first in accordance with Wikipedia standards.


—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fair&Balanced45 (talkcontribs) 13:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

[edit]

It seems that in recent weeks few edits of this article were made with unbalanced view either positive or negative – overwriting each other in the processes. Specifically, content was added about recent events, but previous content deleted - Please keep a neutral view . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.120.85 (talk) 11:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


March 2009

[edit]

I'm declining speedy deletion tag placed by a competitor; the tone is not promotional enough for speedy deletion as spam. Enough notability to keep for now. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 03:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]