Jump to content

Talk:Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleExit Through the Kwik-E-Mart has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Exit Through the Kwik-E-Mart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs) 15:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
  • General
    • No disambiguation links, follows WP:TV-NAME, the article is 1503 words (readable prose size).
  • Plot
    • No issues; follows WP:TVPLOT well, is a good size at 462 words, and the prose is clear and concise, with no typographical errors.
  • Production
    • WP:SURNAME says that after a person's full name is given, they should be referred to by their surname throughout the rest of the article. That said, "Shepard Fairey", "Ron English", "Kenny Scharf", and "Robbie Conal" are repeated in full in this section.
  • Reception
    • No issues; follows WP:TVRECEPTION well, gives a broad analysis of the episode, and does not apply undue weight to any individual review(er).

Overall, very well put-together article. I am placing this on hold for the minor issues to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 16:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

With everything having been addressed, this article now fulfills the good article criteria, and is being promoted. Good job to the nominator and other significant contributors. TRLIJC19 (talkcontribs) 17:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ending credits

[edit]

according to the description on this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZwJ3BZ6gig the ending credits sequence of this video was made by him. I think it should be mentioned. 209.112.184.130 (talk) 00:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]