Jump to content

Talk:Exile (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I shall review this one. Ruby 2010/2013 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Both the writer and director have close ties to Star Trek: Voyager" --> tense issue (I think it should be "had")
  • Be consistent with percentages (% vs. percent)
  • "The episode which followed "Exile" was a repeat of the season premiere, "The Xindi", in order to avoid putting new episodes up against a game of the 2003 Baseball World Series on the Fox Network. However, that re-run received a 2.6 rating, which was higher than "Exile" from a week earlier." -- Just clarifying that the rerun of "The Xindi" aired the hour after "Exile", or the week after? (I'm not sure because normally episodes of the same series don't air one after another, at least in the US, unless they're marathons of something)
  • Added a few words at the start to say it aired the week after - and broke it up into two sentences as I thought it was getting rather long. I just thought it was worth mentioning that the episode got even lower ratings than a re-run up against the world series! Miyagawa (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article only contains 2 reviews. Are there any others out there?
  • I've just had a dig around online and I could only find those two from reliable sources. It wasn't an episode picked up by mass media. (It's a pretty forgettable one really). Miyagawa (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having not seen the series, what makes Velton Ray Bunch the episode's featured music?
  • I couldn't find a reliable source for it, so I've removed it from the article. I've found sources for other episodes that he scored, but couldn't find one for "Exile". Miyagawa (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As always, only a few issues to nitpick. I'll place the review on hold for the standard 7 days and will return to re-review once the above have been addressed. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 04:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]