Talk:Exercises in Style

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes

Um... this is NOT NPOV:

"The retellings range from breathless to hilarious (especially "Maladroit", where the narrator recaps in one sentence the entire preceding page), and the collection is a brilliant display of literary mastery."

That is quite possibly the most POV statement I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Leaving aside the "brilliant display of literary mastery", the word "hilarious" and even the fact that only ONE example is given of the styles used, are way too POV in favor of the book/particular stories. "Hilarious" is completely subjective, as are "brilliant" and "literary mastery", and why is only ONE version of the story included if there's more than one extremely varying style used?

I do not know enough about the book to be able to rework this sentence, but it needs it badly. Though I will remove the second half of the sentence, since I can do that without talking about stuff I don't know. ;) Runa27 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the infobox (though the information is currently somewhat incomplete), and NPOV'd it slightly as best I could.

However, looking at the length of the [Wikipedia's article] on this, could a French-speaker possibly translate some of it to here? It dearly needs it, and the French version seems to have much, much more information. (I don't speak French, so I can't translate it myself) Runa27 22:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeing with your remarks, I have removed the remains of the sentence as well. The anonymous edit by 85.228.228.75 is mine; I forgot to log in. EldKatt (Talk) 14:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

translation

It was translated to Serbian language by Danilo Kiš. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.74.159 (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exercises in Style. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150109223812/http://www.uprightdown.com/issue1contents.html to http://uprightdown.com/issue1contents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]