Talk:Exercise Red Flag

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Not NPOV

This article seems clearly sympathetic and admiring in tone, e.g.: "Their hard, imaginative work over the early years would confirm Red Flag's promise and turn it into the finest training system in aviation history". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.233.217 (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.229.91 (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"And?" This is an enciclopedia, must be neutral. MachoCarioca (talk) 09:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It might just be stating a cold hard fact... :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.227.223 (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explain objectively (what ranking system? What methodology? What statistics?) how it it is "the finest training system in aviation history," and maybe you would receive more support. 98.169.111.167 (talk) 06:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. Blindly stating "finest in aviation history" sounds like a line out of a marketing plan. Many air forces have robust DACT exercises. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.77.166 (talk) 23:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I don't like is the fact that they have totally ignored the original Groups designation, I was on the Red Flag staff from 77 to 82. We were then the 4440th Tactical Fighter Training Group (TFTG). I was maintenance, Aerospace Ground Equipment, and actually set up the Table of Allowances for equipment in the group. By pre-positioning the equipment, we saved the Air Force hundered's of thousands of dollars a year on airlift. At the time, TSgt Jim Bohan, I retired as a MSgt at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.4.84 (talk) 17:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Exercise Red Flag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]