Talk:Exercise Ardent

A fact from Exercise Ardent appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 1952's Exercise Ardent was the largest air exercise since World War II, involving around 1,300 aircraft and 200,000 personnel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Exercise Ardent.

Wikipedia

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that 1952's Exercise Ardent was the largest air exercise since World War II, involving around 1,300 aircraft and 200,000 personnel? Source: Ward and Gough

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 17:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Reviewd Karthyayani Amma

This interesting article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I added "around" 1,300 to the hook and the article to agree with the source. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]