Talk:Exelon Pavilions/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- "Beeby is also the designer of the Joan W. and Irving B. Harris Theater for Music and Dance." - parenthetical... remove as it doesn't have anything to do with the Exelon Pavilions.
- I revised the text to clarify the significance of the link.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- "The North Pavilions are the first Chicago buildings to use building integrated photovoltaic cells, i.e., a solar energy system incorporated into the building's construction materials." - why the i.e.? That clause seems to be a definition of the term.
- I reworded this.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- " the future expansion of the Art Institute of Chicago." - calling it the Modern Wing is probably OK; linking to it would be better. Spellcheck on "pavlions".
- There is no link for the Modern Wing that I know of.
- "Beeby is also the designer of the Joan W. and Irving B. Harris Theater for Music and Dance." - parenthetical... remove as it doesn't have anything to do with the Exelon Pavilions.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- "The pavilions provide sufficient energy to power the equivalent of 14 star-rated energy-efficient houses in Chicago." - checked the source, and sure enough, that's what it says. star-rated should be linked... somewhere. Energy Star?
- Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Need more details as to what that actually meant.
- At some point it should be noted that Exelon and ComEd are energy utilites/distributors (whichever is technically correct).
- "The pavilions provide sufficient energy to power the equivalent of 14 star-rated energy-efficient houses in Chicago." - checked the source, and sure enough, that's what it says. star-rated should be linked... somewhere. Energy Star?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I tried to think of other major aspects of the pavilions, but couldn't really think of any. So it looks pretty good; just some minor issues. —Rob (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
I addressed a couple of points, and now I think it meets the criteria. —Rob (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)