This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Sometimes the sky is blue - The other page doesn't want this merged in. It's been over a month since any input at TALK for Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity about merging so I have closed the discussion there, and so will remove the merge tag here. The general desire there seems to lack adding material to that article from here. More a general expressing of feeling that this article was not needed or AfD instead, as your own part of the discussion recommended. But while I was willing to help start the documenting part of WP:MERGE discussion, I'm bowing out and cleaning up since I'm not inclined to go further into starting an AfD and not going to take on the Wikipedia:Proposed mergers to match Dr. Fleischman's mention of it being contentious as I saw no contention. Cheers Markbassett (talk) 16:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article "Provisions" could use commentary and paraphrasing key points per cites. Right now it's too literal and just repeating the document without making it and the meaning easier to understand. The more normal examples for EO would seem to be Executive Order 13780 or Executive Order 12968 and so on that describe what the EO does or parts of it are. Markbassett (talk) 04:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]