Talk:Excellence in Research for Australia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Australia: Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal Excellence in Research for Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

journal lists

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 04:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More info at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Academic_Journals#Excellence_in_Research_for_Australia_journal_lists and the two A* lists have been better analysed:

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Formal journal ranking lists are history now.http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/end-of-an-era-journal-rankings-dropped/story-e6frgcjx-1226065864847 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.65.98 (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ERA results out

The ERA 2010 results are now out. There is a mix of responses in the news, which we need to integrate.[1] John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some possible problems

I feel that this article is overdoing it a bit. For example, I don't see why a complete list of participating institutions is needed (can easily be linked to on the ERA website). Also, as an anonymous IP pointed out in a recent edit summary, the list of the 15 top universities is completely available elsewhere. Apart from a remark "the three top institutions were...", I don't see the need for a table with 15 institutions and their detailed scores on many different criteria. Re-focusing the article on what this is about, rather than the particular results obtained, seems to be a more useful approach. Just my 2 cents... --Crusio (talk) 09:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the list of institutions. I suspect that the list is better placed on another article, as the list of institutions that government is fairly consistent across Australian policy and legislation of the Australian higher ed sector.

I also agree with removing the table of results, as the aggregate of scores across a cluster is useless, but I must note that I am heavily involved in the ERA process for one of these institutions. Also the 2010 results (and table in the article) are superseded by the 2012 results (for which we dont have a table). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 04:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms

A few criticisms that should be included: Aboriginal disciplines are invisible https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ojs/index.php/kulumun/article/viewFile/56/45 ; game playing: http://theconversation.com/strength-in-numbers-do-era-rankings-add-up-for-universities-7493 John Vandenberg ^(chat) 04:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellence in Innovation for Australia

The trial of 'Excellence in Innovation for Australia' is probably best included in this article at the moment. https://theconversation.com/universities-to-explain-benefit-of-research-to-end-users-7478 John Vandenberg ^(chat) 04:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00568746/fr/
Triggered by \bhalshs\.archives-ouvertes\.fr on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 07:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Excellence in Research for Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]