Talk:Excelia Group

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Notable academics section

note:copied from here--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary here is incorrect. Academics must meet at least one of the criteria listed here to be considered notable with regard to Wikipedia entries.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The academics mentioned in the articles all meet the criteria, especially the, supposedly contested, candidate, who holds a professorship at Yerevan State University (as visible on the website of that institution), which perfectly complies with the criterium 6 "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society." The other candidates, too, have a fine academic profile as evidenced by the h-index as visible on Google Scholar. Thus, no edit war visible. {unsigned|80.12.42.116}}

Your message makes no sense whatsoever, and your premise is invalid. Having "a fine academic profile" is not one of the criteria for inclusion. Either get consensus on the article talk page to include the names, or continue edit warring and find yourself blocked. Your choice.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria number 6 is being misapplied repeatedly, being a faulty member is not the "highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution". --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]