Talk:Ex hac augusta

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ex hac augusta article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catholicism Low‑importance

Ex hac augusta is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Ex hac augusta is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contradiction?

"The Austrian-Hungarian authorities wanted to diminish the dominance of the Franciscans, who were connected to the South Slavic national movements, ..." but yet "Austria-Hungary insisted on Franciscans taking pastoral care, with the introduction of secular clergy only when necessary." ??? Manannan67 (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in my understanding, the situation is very complex. Certain Franciscan authors like Berislav Gavranović and for that matter Srećko Džaja, support the pro-Franciscan theory that the Franciscans were somehow pro-Slavic anti-Austrian. The main contributor to this thesis is Gavranović, who wrote his capital work on the subject "Uspostava redovite katoličke hijerarhije u Bosni i Hercegovini 1881. godine" (1935) (the Establishment of the Regular Catholic Hierarchy in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1881; I'm a proud owner of the first edition :) ). So, you can understand the context, Austria-Hungary was at war with the Kingdom of Serbia during World War I, and there were two conflicting concepts - Yugoslavism and Austroslavism. Gavranović is a graduate of Belgrade University and since Austria-Hungary collapsed and was replaced by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, he tried to align the Franciscans with the new regime, presenting them as being persecuted by the Austrians. Later authors are aware of that, and some new documents became available (which were unavailable to Gavranović, so he cannot be blamed for bias, intended or not) which shed new light. Austrian-Hungarian authorities actually supported the Franciscans on many issues (see Paškal Buconjić). I'll need to work on the article to clarify the situation. --Governor Sheng (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]