Talk:Ex-ante

before, at, after the event?

then what are the phrase for at the event & after the event? Jackzhp (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

extremely high level of expertise is implied

"Another example of the use of the term ex-ante is in the recruitment industry: Ex-ante is often used when forecasting resource requirements on large future projects. When the word ex-ante is used in this context, an extremely high level of expertise is implied..."

The tone of this paragraph sets off alarm bells for me. I hope someone who understands this matter happens along and re-writes this -- or gets rid of it! -69.87.199.130 (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ( Martin | talk • contribs 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed move

Based on google ngram, the common case is to not use a hyphen (which follows the style manuals I'm familiar with), and the single-word case is rare enough to be considered a typo. Any objection to moving this article to ex ante? Catherine Quotidian (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Article should be renamed. Ex ante is the common case, not the also written as case. EricE (talk) 15:58, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ex-ante. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907043449/http://www.csbancari.ch/pubblicazioni/RMElab/gnos.pdf to http://www.csbancari.ch/pubblicazioni/RMElab/gnos.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]