Talk:Ewelme

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

The position for Ewelme, Oxfordshire is very wrong. It's position should be: 51.615991,-1.070309 not near leicester - thanks for this great service 82.25.68.25 (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looked pretty close to me - I tried your co-ords above, and it put me in the middle of the ocean. I have adjusted them slightly though, to better match with Google Maps. ^Avicenna_sis @ 15:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The co-ordinates were roughly correct, as verified by the location map in the infobox. Avicennasis's "fix" placed the location dot way off the map, which should have been a clue that this was not a "fix" at all. In fact it moved Ewelme from Oxfordshire two counties away to somewhere south of Basingstoke. Simply looking at a real Ordnance Survey map marked with real degrees and minutes with would also indicate that the former co-ordinates were roughly right and Avicennasis's "fix" was way off. I have therefore reverted Avicennasis's edit. Motacilla (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ewelme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.victoriacountyhistory.ac.uk/sites/default/files/work-in-progress/ewelme_intro.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080901174145/http://www.ewelme.net/ to http://www.ewelme.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]