Talk:Ewalt House

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ewalt House article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

I tagged this article for notability. It seems to be falling under circular logic, where the page was used to rationalize acquisition of historic designation, but the process of requesting historic designation is used to rationalize this page's existence. --100.6.59.176 (talk) 17:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of this house (on Wikipedia) does not hinge on whether it is declared a city landmark or not but on sourcing. The notability guideline you linked to lays out the criteria for notability of buildings: "significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources". Properties with historic designations are usually considered notable because a large amount of documentation is required to obtain the historic designation, and this meets the requirement of significant coverage. In this case, there is coverage in several sources: (1) the city landmark nomination, which is fairly exhaustive and includes six pages of text specifically about this building, (2) the NRHP documentation, and (3) coverage in the local press. In my opinion this is more than sufficient to prove notability. Camerafiend (talk) 21:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the issue that searching for "Ewalt House" primarily brings up a different property in Kentucky except with the news coverage of the supposed historic designation occurring in the last few months. --100.6.59.176 (talk) 02:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It meets WP:NBUILDING guidelines. In addition to the current sources I found more: 1, 2 (and corresponding video), 3. The second link from February in addition to landmark nomination research that took much longer than a month or so to write shows the circular logic argument isn't valid. This page was created on May 25th. APK whisper in my ear 16:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is accurate. This house was posted by people trying to support historical validity. The house was torn down because the process violated the owner's civil rights not because of its poor condition. The fact is Mr. Ewalt was a slave owner who violated the civil rights of people and should never have been revered for his house. In addition, the house was in poor condition and didn't meet the criterion of historical significance (again supporting your rebuttal comment). The corrupt politicians, who also sat on the board of the nonprofit that applied for historical preservation, are the ones that pushed it through for their own personal gain. In the end, justice was served! 2600:4041:360:F700:F4D3:91EE:1B3E:4B48 (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]