Talk:Evolutionary origin of religion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Evolutionary origin of religion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evolutionary biology Low‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Homo#list of species|genus ''Homo'']]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evolutionary origin of religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509063432/http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/2004_10_29_religion.htm to http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/2004_10_29_religion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Evolutionary origin of religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

burial as evidence of religion

"burials with grave goods clearly signify religious practices and concern for the dead that transcends daily life." Many other prehistoric discoveries are also ascribed to religious belief. Nonsense. One of the major reasons for the evolution and existence of religion is to explain what is unexplainable--still it's primary function in contemporary society. Paleontologists who discover a carving, a petroglyph, etc. are prone to "explaining" the significance of such discoveries in terms that make them "understandable." There are many other possible explanations for such discoveries, none of which "clearly signify religious practices." Carving of fat lady may be early porno or just a pastime. Burying bodies with their earthly possessions may be a means of avoiding conflict over who would get them. Or just sentiment. Or not wanting to be reminded of the death of a loved one. My first question to any paleontologist who investigates such discoveries would be "Are you a religious believer?" Be very careful of "clearly signify." Relative to the existence of deities, those who believe in such things are unable to explain why, over the 200,000 years of the existence homo sapiens, that these deities appear only in the last 8-10 thousand years. So, where were these gods hiding for all those millennia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.160.205 (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia must summarize the views of mainstream scholars, via reliable sources. —Paleo Neonate – 12:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of Chauvet animals half human

"Cave paintings at Chauvet depict creatures that are half human and half animal."

I have not found anything to support this claim. Can anyone verify this? ---Wolfe (talk) 03:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this article is an oxymoron

Religions say that there was no evolution. 172.58.174.142 (talk) 12:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]