Jump to content

Talk:Evesham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEvesham was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 14, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Archive 1. Archive 2.

GA again?

[edit]

Evesham - ready for GA?

[edit]

Something on my watchlist recently drew my renewed attention to this article. A couple of years ago several of us spent some time improving and expanding this article with the aim of hetting it to GA. On further review, I believe it is very close to GA as it now stands. The review will of course reveal areas for further improvement, but it generally failed uncontentiously because at the wrong moment some of us were not available to address the points raised. What do we think about re-nominating it? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evesham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evesham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Evesham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first picture is out of date

[edit]

The first picture is out of date because in 2008 a new bronze sculpture "The vision of the swineherd Eof" was placed on a stone plinth (there being a titanium time capsule beneath the plinth) that stands in the area in front of the black and white building. The statue is beautiful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eof#Legend

https://www.a4a.co.uk/Evesham.html

There is a picture in Google street view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:3195:AC01:F031:CB7C:9E8F:DBDE (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The statue is actually around the back right hand side of the building as it's photographed so I believe the photo is still okay to use as it is. 80.189.133.88 (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected to Evesham from the Vale of Evesham but Vale of Evesham is larger

[edit]

Redirected to Evesham from the Vale of Evesham but Vale of Evesham is something bigger. Is it possible to find out if a Vale of Evesham article once existed and can we get it back if so and work on that or can we perhaps create one? Of particular interest to me is researching what area this actually extends to. I am working on a list which I can contribute but I came to Wikipedia to actually help verify it originally but such a list or an article about the larger area does not exist. 80.189.133.88 (talk) 16:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is basically about notability; see Wikipedia:Notability. The question is whether there are significant sources discussing the Vale of Evesham. I expect there are. Jim Killock (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Evesham&oldid=1243433368"