Talk:Everything We Need

Everything We Need has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Everything We Need is part of the Jesus Is King series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 26, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed
November 24, 2022	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 1, 2022.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kanye West recorded "Everything We Need" as a new version of his leaked track "The Storm"?

Current status: Good article

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christian music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Everything We Need/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: VersaceSpace (talk · contribs) 16:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this momentarily. —VersaceSpace 🌃 16:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very well written, I have very few issues with it, which are as follows:

I think the RapReviews commentary could be safely removed as it's a non-notable publication, and the reviewer is employed by The Young Folks (not a notable publication either).

Not done per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, this website is reliable. --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think a Kanye picture without the MAGA hat would be more suitable in the 'release and reception' section.

Comment: are you sure this matters, as it is one of the few photos of him from 2018/19 period? --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think a less divisive picture would be better, but if there's no alternative, I suppose this is fine. My fear is that to readers this might read as snide or "shady" towards Ye —VersaceSpace 🌃 19:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why the website paramater of ref 28 says Billboard Pro and not just Billboard?

This is because it is from the pro version of Billboard, which is subscription access only. --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that fact, but is it not the same publication? I've never seen Billboard cited this way. —VersaceSpace 🌃 19:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations stand alone in their usage so I think the website names can be wiki-linked in every possible citation.

Not done since this would cause users who interpret WP:OVERLINK differently to say the sources are overlinked --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something specific that the Hip hop-n-More cite is referencing, which is not being taken care of by the Highsnobiety citation? If not then ref 5 can be removed.

Ref 5 gives the month of the leak as well as who was featured on vocals. --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On hold, but this is very good. —VersaceSpace 🌃 17:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VersaceSpace Thanks for your comments, I have responded to them above. --K. Peake 19:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: I've responded to (two of) yours. —VersaceSpace 🌃 19:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VersaceSpace: I have replaced the photo of West with one I now found actually from 2019 after you elaborated on your point, however I'll elaborate on the Billboard one that Pro is only in brackets so isn't that acceptable? --K. Peake 19:38, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think "pro" should be in that parameter at all. The subscription is called Billboard Pro, but the website and publication are still just Billboard. That the subscription is named doesn't mean it's a part of the website's name. —VersaceSpace 🌃 19:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VersaceSpace Big kudos to you for that explanation; I have removed pro altogether now. --K. Peake 20:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. All the issues I raised have been addressed now, so I'll ✓ Pass this! —VersaceSpace 🌃 20:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Kanye West re-recorded his leaked track "The Storm" as "Everything We Need"? Source: Kanye West: Jesus Is King review – rap genius can't see the light - The Guardian
- ALT1: ... that Kanye West recorded "Everything We Need" as a new version of his leaked track "The Storm"? Source: Kanye West: Jesus Is King review – rap genius can't see the light - The Guardian
- Reviewed: Point and Shoot (Better Call Saul)

Improved to Good Article status by Kyle Peake (talk). Self-nominated at 06:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

I have temporarily duplicated the Guardian citation in the article because "each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation [...] appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact." It can be removed after the hook has its turn on the Main Page. Otherwise this seems fine to me, nice work! Both hooks are fine with me (slight preference for #2 but the promoter can make the final call). DanCherek (talk) 20:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]