Jump to content

Talk:Every Mother Counts 2012/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Sources

Extended content

---Another Believer (Talk) 06:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Every Mother Counts 2012/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 01:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


Initial comments

  • An alt description is required for the album cover
Done. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Any information on the producer?
Not from the sources I came across. The album's liner notes may have more detail, but I don't have access to them (I even checked my local library system's collection). ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • In the lead, should you mention that six of the tracks included were previously released?
  • Usually album descriptions note previously unreleased tracks, as there's nothing really special about tracks folks have already had access to before. I think this detail belongs in the article's prose, but not the lead. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I could be wrong about this, but I don't think a comma belongs after "live rendition of "Sister" by Dave Matthews Band"; and, should ", respectively." be placed after "Sting's previously available song."?
  • I think the comma was added by a Guild of Copy Editors reviewer. Perhaps the sentence is more grammatically correct with the comma, but since you and I both think it isn't necessary, I'll go ahead and remove. I also added "respectively". ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • "Corinna, Corrina" should link to "Corrine, Corrina"
  • Reference #1 - Link to AllMusic
ON HOLD – Yes, yes, yes. Another good article! Ping me when you're done. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC).
@Carbrera: Thank you for reviewing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.