Talk:Eversheds Sutherland

This article was nominated for deletion on April 13, 2017. The result of the discussion was delete.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eversheds Sutherland article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

RS eversheds-sutherland (talk · contribs) has been paid by Eversheds Sutherland. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosure on userpage.
ST eversheds-sutherland (talk · contribs) has been paid by Eversheds Sutherland. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosure on userpage.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Brand aid". The Lawyer. 30 April 2012.

Article Issues

This article is written mostly by "webcontentteam" (clearly an in-house IT/Marketing function) and includes one source throughout. Blatent advert, conflict of interest and unsourced article. Liverrich (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chairman in 2007?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfessorXY (talk • contribs) 21:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

I propose to move this page to Eversheds Sutherland. What do you think? SethWhales^talk 10:14, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, as uncontroversial, since this is the correct name now and Sutherland had no article that needed merging anyway. @Seth Whales: This article needs to be updated with the history of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan though, so please help with that if possible. Since I know people working at Eversheds from my studies and professional career, I am wary of making changes myself. Regards So Why 12:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change opening line as is now very inaccurate.

Since Eversheds Sutherland is now a combination of two law firms (Eversheds and Sutherland Law), US regulators forbid the new entity to be named as a law 'firm'. Please can this be edited so the passage reads as below.

Eversheds Sutherland Ltd (until 1 February 2017: Eversheds LLP and Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP) is a global multinational law practice.

Headquartered in London part should now be removed because as a combination entity we do not have one single headquarters. Also the reference to being in the top largest 50 law firm in the world links to a page which has Sutherland Asbill & Brennan listed, so please remove this also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ST eversheds-sutherland (talk • contribs) 15:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ST eversheds-sutherland:

Done. Regards So Why 16:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the changes So Why - however the opening text does not still not describe the company accurately - Please see text below which is taken from the footer of the Eversheds Sutherland global website (http://www.eversheds-sutherland.com) and explains how the different entities operate under one global brand and why it cannot be referred to as a 'law firm' but only a 'law practice'.

Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities.

Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ST eversheds-sutherland (talk • contribs) 08:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Geraint Thomas

I don't think this section is appropriate while there is still an ongoing investigation around Geraint's death and propose it is removed as it cites an article which suggests foul play when nothing has been proven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ST eversheds-sutherland (talk • contribs) 09:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]