Talk:Everesting

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Best times

Currently there is only a single entry for the men's and women's best times. Given the times have been broken a number of times in recent months wouldn't it be better to have a list showing more entries? This would enable readers to understand changes over time and also to compare efforts as they are all made under different conditions. Davidreid (talk) 07:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page has now been edited to show the ten fastest times for men and women. Thanks to User:XyZAn for doing this. Davidreid (talk) 10:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of article and changes

This article is currently pretty low quality.

It needs to describe the rules and conditions of Everesting more: do riders have to go up and down the same side of a hill? Who judges whether an official record is broken - are there official timekeepers or is something like Strava used? Do records need to be solo attempts or can they be in groups? I don't know any of these things from this article.

I also don't like the "Everesting highlights by country" list. First, it is entirely unreferenced. Second, what determines why an entry is made on the list is not clear. Some of the efforts listed seem to go way beyond the Everest height - so are these attempts of Everesting, or are they just a list of a big days out people have had on their bike?

My suggestion would be to:

Add a section which more clearly describes what Everesting is, who determines it, and the variations that riders chose to do (eg double Everesting etc)
Remove entirely the 'highlights by country' section. Wikipedia is not a place for athletes to list their best efforts at a challenge, however impressive many of them are: that's Strava, or the Everesting website. The 'notable attempts' can stay, within reason, and retaining the top 10 fastest men's and women's times (plus a list of the historical record progression?) is a given.

I'm minded to do some research and make those changes but given they're quite substantial I thought I'd raise it here first to get any objections/suggestions for improvement. Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 08:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Best times or best riders?

We have two times listed for Illi Gardner, but only one for Ronan McLaughlin (also has a 7:04:41 which would be third on this list). I'm not too bothered which we go with (slight preference for recording riders' best time only), but the current inconsistency is very poor. Kevin McE (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]