Talk:Evander Kane

Evander Kane has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 16, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by San Jose Sharks task force.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Evander Kane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Early life section, this is just me, but maybe adding Evander Holyfield's nationality might help.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Vancouver Giants (2006–09) section, is "mononucleosis" correctly linked? Same section, please link "Spokane Chiefs" once. Dates in the references should not be linked.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
Ref. 35 is missing Publisher info.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:
Are Hockeydb.com and HockeysFuture.com reliable sources?

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the above statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions

Thanks for taking the time to review. I addressed the issues raised as follows:

Added Holyfield's nationality as American.
- Check.
I realize that mononucleosis is a disambig page and this should be avoided, however, the ref does not specify which type of mono Kane had. Is it ok to leave it this way?
- Yeah, but if you want to take it to FAC, it'll be a problem, but it's fine here.
Removed the redundant link for "Spokane Chiefs".
- Check.
Unlinked dates in references.
- Check.
Added publishes for ref 35: National Hockey League
- Check.
Replaced hockeydb.com and hockeyfutures references with Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Western Hockey League refs, respectively.
- I was just wondering if they were reliable... or not. But, if you replaced them with suitable sources, no problem there. :) Also, check.

Let me know if there's anything else I can do/if my revisions are not yet suitable. Thanks! Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome for the review, and no, everything is taken care of. Thank you to Orlandkurtenbach for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evander Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing info/error in the article

In the section in regards to the domestic violence allegations, there seems to be no name in the place where there should be one in order for the sentence to make sense. If it was removed for legal/privacy reasons, then the section should be re-written as to not require the name in order for the sentence to make sense.

--Dominik W. 21:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominik2016 (talk • contribs)