This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
A fact from Evan Vaughan Anwyl appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Is this form of the name used by Evan Vaughan Anwyl himself? If not I can see no justification at all for using it here. Seems rather odd that a modern Welsh-speaker would choose the antiquated/anglicised form Vychan rather than the standard Fychan as well. Enaidmawr (talk) 23:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I entirely agree - it was a mistake when making the link as I had "cambricized" the name elsewhere and it had linked to the wrong version. The name of the page, ought to be, Evan Vaughan Anwyl. If this can be changed I would be grateful. My apologies James Frankcom (talk) 07:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing that up, James. Unfortunately the page Evan Vaughan Anwyl will have to be deleted first by an administrator for the move to succeed (just tried). Would you like to make the request? I'm pretty busy on the Welsh wikipedia at the moment (if only I was an admin here as well...!). Enaidmawr (talk) 22:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Geaugagrrl. The problem with that is that the article's history is then lost (remains on this page, of course). Ideally a move is better (and normal practice on wikipedia). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do any more of the references need adding to that other article to avoid having to find them again at a later date? If not and whats been transferred is everything, we may as well redirect. BritishWatcher (talk) 09:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Evan Vaughan Anwyl/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I can in no way see how this article can be of top importance to WP Wales. The family state that they make no claim to the lineage and even if true, it is a dead line. I am happy to discuss, but Top articles should be few and far between. Henry V only gets a mid ranking for WP Wales, and that is where I think this article should be levelled.
Last edited at 06:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 14:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)