Talk:Eustace Tilley
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eustace Tilley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Eustace Tilley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Based on the last name and a monocled publicity photo there are fringe theorists who speculate that this character was actually derived from Vesta Tilley.
- https://emdashes.com/2008/02/eustace-tilley-inspired-by-fam.php
- https://monkeysox.blogspot.com/2008/02/eustace-tilley-impersonates-vesta.html
-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Jstor
[edit]I don't often cite journal articles. this popped up when researching this topic. I have not read it to consider its contents for inclusion.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
( )
Eustace Tilley on the cover of the first edition of The New Yorker in 1925
- ... that in 2017, Eustace Tilley (pictured) missed his annual turn on The New Yorker cover because of Donald Trump? Source: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/cover-story-2017-02-13
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sheryl Cooper
- Comment: 2nd of 2 QPQs
Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 05:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Eustace Tilley; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- This page previously redirected to a section of The New Yorker#Eustace Tilley.
Substantial interesting article on plenty of sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I accept the hook, it made me curious. I'm open though to something mentioning that “Liberty’s Flameout." was presented instead. I also think the "because of DT" could be a bit clearer in the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:Gerda Arendt would the hook have made you as curious without "because of DT"?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Let's not discuss my stance there, please. Perhaps it's neutral enough to say that I became interested only because of the image. - I said in the article it could be clearer what DT had to do with the unusual break of tradition, not in the hook. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread. The hook made you curious and the article needs clarification. Will have a look.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Let's not discuss my stance there, please. Perhaps it's neutral enough to say that I became interested only because of the image. - I said in the article it could be clearer what DT had to do with the unusual break of tradition, not in the hook. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- User:Gerda Arendt would the hook have made you as curious without "because of DT"?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The image is licensed and a must ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have amended the text that is related to the hook. I am glad you feel the way I do about the image. In all my experience on DYK, I don't recall seeing such an image endorsement. It is of superior quality and works with a hook that has high level of intrigue.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Related content
[edit]The following non-WP:RS sources have interesting relevant content:
- https://michaelmaslin.com/monday-tilley-watch-the-new-yorker-double-issue-december-25-2023-january-1-2024/
- https://michaelmaslin.com/rea-irvins-talk-of-the-town-town-masthead-a-mere-reassuring-blur/
-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note the 2nd of these says that on May 22, 2017, Christoph Niemann redrew Tilley for the masthead. I can't find an WP:RS noting this.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also, I can only find this WP:PRIMARY source to note that Niemann named his November 20, 2023 The New Yorker cover robot depiction of an AI bot, Till-E.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- According to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Michaelmaslin.com I can use this as a source for the 2017 Tilley revamp.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)