Talk:Eusmilus

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger with Eusmilis

Due to a typo there is a duplicate article, Eusmilis. Since Eusmilus is the correct spelling the two should be merged under this name. Jerkov 21:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect has been createdKpstewart (talk) 05:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nimravinae?

The article says the genus belongs to the subfamily Nimravinae, whereas the wiki article on the family Nimravidae says it belongs to the subfamily Hoplophoninae. Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glevum (talk • contribs) 22:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been corrected in the Eusmilus article 72.242.35.23 (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific name meaning?

The explanation to the meaning "eusmilus" listed in the article is "true saber", while the explanation here states that "eusmilus" means "early saber". Although there are other articles that also say "true saber". I just thought I'd bring it up, and since I'm no expert on scientific/taxonomic names, someone else more knowledgeable should look this over and decide which is correct for this article. 72.242.35.23 (talk) 07:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]